|
Post by TemporarySanity on Aug 4, 2007 17:25:20 GMT -5
What would you like the gameplay of CT4 to be like?
|
|
|
Post by abraveliltoaster on Aug 5, 2007 11:04:57 GMT -5
point and click personally, 3-d graphics are definitely applicable too, if done correctly. would a first person work? i think a first person perspective and point and click wouldn't work but i'm not sure.
|
|
|
Post by ObscureNightmares on Aug 5, 2007 12:36:08 GMT -5
I don't think it would, and I don't really like first-person games all that much. I agree that it should go back to being point-and-click.
|
|
|
Post by birdman on Aug 5, 2007 18:20:58 GMT -5
No way. This is my opinion, so I'm not telling anyone that they're wrong, but point and click is terrible in my eyes. Coming from games like GH, DMC, it's just not possible for me to like a game like that.
It has to be similar to CT3 and HG in terms of movement. I don't know how a boss fight would go because I don't want it like CT3. Can't be like HG either with a dog or something because what made CT3 so good was having no real way to fight back, apart from the stupid magic boss battle.
To make any good idea I'd have to know what type of thing was chasing you. Didn't the old games have real people chasing you? CT3 had phantoms or whatever they were. So depending on what's after you, will heavily influence the game play. Holy water isn't going to hurt a real person is it?
I have one idea. Making your own hiding places. Not sure how it would work. Maybe finding things lying around and put them together.
|
|
|
Post by abraveliltoaster on Aug 6, 2007 7:00:02 GMT -5
would you want boss fights to return? maybe if they were all different not just shoot and capture. that's what i think though...
|
|
|
Post by birdman on Aug 6, 2007 17:02:45 GMT -5
Exactly. In CT3 there were boring with no difficulty or strategy to them. I just can't come up with a way to really fight a boss with out ruining what the game is.
|
|
|
Post by ObscureNightmares on Aug 15, 2007 18:33:51 GMT -5
CT3's free movement just made the game ridiculous. You can't really insult point-and-click until you've played the previous games in the series-the ones that use it. It's classic and how the series should remain.
|
|
|
Post by abraveliltoaster on Aug 16, 2007 15:36:48 GMT -5
thank you obscure. I couldn't agree anymore. I loved the point and click interesting and challenging when you're scared. I dunno what exactly I thought of the whole free roam feature, other then the fact that it was different. I dunno...
|
|
|
Post by birdman on Aug 26, 2007 1:00:09 GMT -5
I find free movement to be the best. Coming from playing a lot of action games, this is the only way for me. I can't see how that makes it ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by abraveliltoaster on Aug 26, 2007 3:25:55 GMT -5
I like both, and I would be happy to see a nother title period I think. Even if it is flawed and not what I was exactly wanting. That is what CT3 was for me. I still loved it.
|
|
|
Post by leon101 on Aug 21, 2011 0:56:17 GMT -5
I don't think it would, and I don't really like first-person games all that much. I agree that it should go back to being point-and-click. I'm afraid that companies don't like to make games tailored towards just one person or a small group. They want them to be more mainstream. In other words, point and click is O.U.T. Out.
|
|
|
Post by ObscureNightmares on Sept 20, 2011 10:17:57 GMT -5
I don't think it has to be. After all, most PC adventure games are still point-and-click, aren't they?
|
|